Royal Mail declares war on the CWU

30,000 scabs: Royal Mail declares war on the CWU
Workers Power statement on postal strike – 18 October 2009

Royal Mail has announced its intention to hire 30,000 temps to work through the strike, refuse to talk seriously and even derecognise the CWU. But an all-out indefinite strike, backed up with solidarity action, can halt the bosses and the Labour government in their tracks more…

Labour to the rescue!!

Billy Hayes has led a last ditch attempt to defend the Labour link, submitting a CWU motion to Labour’s September conference for the government to take “immediate steps to take responsibility for” the Royal Mail pension deficit, possibly as high as £20 billion thanks to the government’s 13 year pension holiday in the 1990′s and the fact it was all invested on the stock market!

The resolution was unanimously supported, while Brown in an earlier speech gave (pretty vague) support to the idea of a Post Office People’s Bank.

While Billy and the other Labourites in the party are toasting each other over this great victory for our union, there is a problem. The unions have for a few years now put resolutions to Labour Party conference on worthwhile working class issues – privatisation, council housing and last year what would have been a popular windfall tax on utilities. Labour ministers are then wheeled out to inform journalists that the government will ignore the vote and continue with its current policies!

This reached a low point when the 2008 Labour Party conference passed a statement that it supported “a vision of a wholly publicly-owned, integrated Royal Mail Group”. Only four months later Brown and Mandy were gunning for privatisation before the ink was even dry on the Hooper report! It’s clear that Labour promises are not worth the paper they are printed on.

The government is unlikely to take on the huge pension deficit, when it is trying to outcompete the Tories in cuts. But hard-hitting industrial action that defeats Royal Mail would directly threaten the government with such a crisis that it could be forced to follow through on the pension “commitment”. Founding a new anti-capitalist party could pile on the pressure too – then Labour couldn’t take the workers’ vote for granted!

Labour party booted out of London CWU (indicatively)

At a rally in London on Wednesday the results of the London Division’s indicative ballot were announced with 96% or more in favour of suspending funding to Labour, effectively disaffiliating from the party that brought you the European Postal Directive, Allan Leighton, Consignia, Crozier, Postcomm, competition in the postal market, Hooper report, Mandelson, privatisation…need we go on?!  We all remember Gordon Brown’s sympathetic support to our strike in 2007 (“they should get back to work”) and Mandy’s heartfelt response to the CWU’s demand that the government take on the pension (“I have instructed it will not happen. It is time for the union to wake up to the need for change”).

Instead of throwing more money (£1 million last year!) at Labour the unions should come together and build a new, anticapitalist party to unite our resistance to the capitalist crisis.

Originally London CWU tops pledged to defy union rules and disaffiliate, before backing down. Now there is a clear message from the rank and file: stop shackling us to this party that is attacking us.

Let’s roll out real ballots around the country, rules or no rules.  After all, its not like the PEC has broken conference decisions left right and centre – they were supposed to ballot us in March 2009 if Labour had not backed down on privatisation or pension cuts. And what happened to that 2 July timetable on industrial action?